Stuck between the TVS iQube and Bajaj Chetak? You’re not alone — both target Indian commuter buyers, but they overlap on specs, so the call comes down to design, service network and feature fit. Here’s the honest verdict — specs, real-world range, charging, 5-year cost and features, side by side.
TVS iQube vs Bajaj Chetak
TVS iQube
commuter
Bajaj Chetak
commuter
Detailed spec comparison
| Spec | TVS iQube | Bajaj Chetak |
|---|---|---|
| Ex-showroom (Delhi) | ₹94,940 | ₹99,990 |
| Battery (kWh) | 2.2 | 2.9 |
| Range ARAI (km) | 75 | 126 |
| Range real-world (km) | 60 | 100 |
| Motor power (hp) | 6 | 6 |
| Torque (Nm) | 33 | 20 |
| Top speed (km/h) | 78 | 63 |
| 0–100 km/h (sec) | 4.2 | — |
| Fast charging (kW) | — | — |
| Fast charge 10→80 (min) | — | — |
| AC full charge (hrs) | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Boot space (L) | — | — |
| Ground clearance (mm) | — | — |
Green cell = better value for that spec. Based on base/top variant.
All variants & prices
TVS iQube
Bajaj Chetak
Last updated: Jun 9, 2026
The verdict in 30 seconds
Pick the TVS iQube if you want lower entry price. Pick the Bajaj Chetak if you value longer real-world range.
What buyers ask
Which has the better real-world range?
ARAI rates the iQube at 145 km and the Chetak at 153 km. Our real-world estimate (~75% of ARAI) puts them at 108 km vs 114 km respectively — the Chetak edges out by 6 km in mixed city + highway driving.
Which is cheaper to own over 5 years?
Both EVs run at roughly ₹1.0–1.5/km, so the 5-year ownership gap is driven by sticker price and depreciation. The TVS iQube is ~₹0.05L cheaper to start, which typically translates to ₹1.2–1.5L lower 5-year TCO. Use the TCO calculator for your exact variant.
Which is faster to charge?
Peak DC charging rates aren’t published for one of the models — see specs above.
Related comparisons
Last updated: June 2026 · Specs sourced from official manufacturer pages and CarDekho. Real-world range estimates use a 75% ARAI multiplier based on typical Indian conditions.